Conservative historian comes under scrutiny from academics, who describe his thesis as unscientific, biased, and cluttered with misleading statements.
3 articles read within 30 days
Register for free to read a limited number of articles from the past month.
Find out about premium plans.
Already a member? Please log in here.
Register for free to read more.
Find out about membership plans.
Already a member? Please log in here.
Conservative historian comes under scrutiny from academics, who describe his thesis as unscientific, biased, and cluttered with misleading statements.