16 August 1993 Considering that I wasn’t among those who wrote it, I cannot reply directly, and can take the question as a reason for participating in the renewed discussions on the so-called Memorandum. I would, above all, support the idea of a “critical edition”–whatever that may mean in this case. It must be shown […]

You have reached an article for premium members. To read this article please login if you are already a TOL member. Or continue to read our content from the past month.

You can subscribe here to gain access.